Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759554AbZKYTLe (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:11:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758977AbZKYTLd (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:11:33 -0500 Received: from mail-bw0-f227.google.com ([209.85.218.227]:64544 "EHLO mail-bw0-f227.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758960AbZKYTLc (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:11:32 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=ZzffWrvLjSV2pWvvqWiIlzfGgnHVmBclnOXlMtBMjLEOhq+hAu7zHWxy1N2qa55dpf PxCGlXVAyO9TSPVcC3tdLruH66soAUDiKPUYL1S69NrB9M87UhjFD74QtclLs/UobIMU 9LBpwtwVQhrZOKfO4+Lf4qPH7izpr26kjhhWg= Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:11:05 +0100 From: Jarek Poplawski To: Caleb Cushing Cc: Frans Pop , Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Kirsher , Jesse Brandeburg , e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: large packet loss take2 2.6.31.x Message-ID: <20091125191105.GA3167@ami.dom.local> References: <81bfc67a0911232217n41b9ac02w3b7770b789e5d209@mail.gmail.com> <20091124111946.GA7883@ff.dom.local> <81bfc67a0911250606k1ec76354n217da9ca20b3517c@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <81bfc67a0911250606k1ec76354n217da9ca20b3517c@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1107 Lines: 29 On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 09:06:30AM -0500, Caleb Cushing wrote: > > Anyway, since there are problems with > > getting stats from the router we still can't compare them, or check > > for the dropped stats. (Btw, could you check for /proc/net/softnet_stat > > yet?) > > router? good kernel? bad kernel? router. > > > So, it might be the kernel problem you reported, but there is not > > enough data to prove it. Then my proposal is to try to repeat this > > problem in more "testing friendly" conditions - preferably against > > some other, more up-to-date linux box, if possible? > > yeah 2.6.31.6 works on my laptop fine I'll just have to see about > getting a direct connection to it. probably do that after I bring the > other NIC back from home, on thanksgiving. This other NIC is a really good idea, so let's wait and see. Happy Thanksgiving! Jarek P. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/