Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759642AbZKYTy2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:54:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759623AbZKYTy1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:54:27 -0500 Received: from mail-ew0-f219.google.com ([209.85.219.219]:40183 "EHLO mail-ew0-f219.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759610AbZKYTy0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:54:26 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:message-id:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=CEenpVv/L7hlDxX9ZAGp0JHNeAwAUgo5ohMA3N9/4/UwngbyCxB6IRvuMvWkP85daA v11jjUY7ipYC8zgATIJbRmhzsb82kgqiSruIiB3208ugSN+66r8d93HKnjqDhgJ32BRT g7gWpDIjnPr3zhLISI0F3k6LUop0oLh0eH4AM= From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: Alan Cox Subject: Re: [PATCH 82/86] pata_via: clear UDMA transfer mode bit for PIO and MWDMA Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:53:09 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/2.6.31.5-0.1-desktop; KDE/4.3.1; x86_64; ; ) Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20091125170218.5446.13513.sendpatchset@localhost> <200911251910.06924.bzolnier@gmail.com> <20091125193419.2457c0ae@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20091125193419.2457c0ae@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <200911252053.09387.bzolnier@gmail.com> Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1400 Lines: 34 On Wednesday 25 November 2009 08:34:19 pm Alan Cox wrote: > On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:10:06 +0100 > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > > On Wednesday 25 November 2009 07:06:48 pm Alan Cox wrote: > > > > Do you really find such tidy patch hard to review? > > > > > > When doing it at speed - yes. > > > > Do you review everybody else patches 'at speed' or only mine? > > All of them when I've got a lot of stuff to do. Owing to a lack of time > machine and 500 hour days it's neccessary. > > Also btw take it is a compliment - there are some people's patches I > always review in detail and it isn't the patches you expect to be *right* > that you spend the time on... Well, you don't really have to review every single patch touching areas that you're just interested in (and if you're maintaining those drivers please document it in MAINTAINERS file, thanks). The problem is that in case you're not entirely correct, which is much more likely when doing things 'at speed', you're will be wasting time for everybody (not that I really care that much about others' time but I do care about mine). -- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/