Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 2 Apr 2002 19:51:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 2 Apr 2002 19:51:09 -0500 Received: from adsl-63-194-239-202.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net ([63.194.239.202]:35834 "EHLO mmp-linux.matchmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 2 Apr 2002 19:51:03 -0500 Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 16:52:44 -0800 From: Mike Fedyk To: Mark Cooke Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Raid5 resync slow with one linear array Message-ID: <20020403005244.GE952@matchmail.com> Mail-Followup-To: Mark Cooke , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20020402022822.GA961@matchmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 06:35:29AM +0100, Mark Cooke wrote: > Hi Mike, > > Have you checked individual transfer rates to the drives / md devices ? Each drive transfers 18-20MB/sec, and all have been tested with badblocks -w. > > I saw (non-reproducible unfortunately) a bad-transfer rate between one > of my drives in an ide raid setup, where the drive was only pushing ~ > 2MB/sec, even after being explictly zapped with hdparm. A power cycle > fixed it, and it hasn't happenned since. > Hmm, I don't think I'm dealing with bad hardware. All are SCA SCSI and tested. > Did you try building it with different chunk sizes ? > No, my root filesystem is on this array. I think 32k chunks are ok. Mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/