Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755164AbZKZOdR (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:33:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754354AbZKZOdR (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:33:17 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:22757 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753095AbZKZOdQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:33:16 -0500 Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:27:45 +0100 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Ingo Molnar , Alexey Dobriyan , Ananth Mavinakayanahalli , "Frank Ch. Eigler" , Peter Zijlstra , Roland McGrath , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, utrace-devel@redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC,PATCH 0/14] utrace/ptrace Message-ID: <20091126142745.GA4382@redhat.com> References: <20091124200127.GA5751@redhat.com> <20091125214818.GA4916@infradead.org> <20091126091052.GF1389@elte.hu> <20091126104722.GA8316@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091126104722.GA8316@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1252 Lines: 33 On 11/26, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > What the patches in the current form do is to introduce two different > ptrace implementations, with one used on the architectures getting most > testing and another secondary one for left over embedded or dead > architectures with horrible results. Yes, nobody likes 2 implementations. I guess Roland and me hate CONFIG_UTRACE much more than anybody else. > So removing the old one is much > better. I am in no position to discuss this option. It is very easy to remove the old code and break !HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK architectures. Although personally I am not sure this is practical. If we merge utrace, perhaps we will get more attention from maintainers, the old code will be "officially" deprecated/obsolete. I sent some trivial initial changes in arch/um/ a long ago, the patch was silently ignored. Even if I was able to fix arch/xxx myself, I don't understand how can I send the patches to maintainers until utrace is already merged in -mm at least. Oleg. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/