DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:organization:user-agent
         :mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to
         :x-enigmail-version:x-age:x-location:x-os:x-face:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        b=SsYhrre+qev+KPfnU0+tA65Up1U7cWsXrCKfoqZKAyAuEShroMNVD+30ex1qWWu9q/
         Z3rp40RovEbhGvLOtsNDANIXwa59O1YFEOAviYISypdrEAN1xh9svbJiKK3TnxYMFpA0
         OObMgHbt+6lJwMoUpvoDSq/rRKzU5PXb7hrho=
Message-ID: <4B0F31DB.6020009@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 02:56:43 +0100
From: =?UTF-8?B?VmVkcmFuIEZ1cmHEjQ==?= <vedran.furac@gmail.com>
Reply-To: vedran.furac@gmail.com
Organization: Home
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.8.1.22) Gecko/20091109 Thunderbird/2.0.0.22 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
CC: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
       David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
       Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk>,
       KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] oom_kill: use rss value instead of vm size for badness
References: <20091028175846.49a1d29c.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>	<alpine.DEB.2.00.0910280206430.7122@chino.kir.corp.google.com>	<abbed627532b26d8d96990e2f95c02fc.squirrel@webmail-b.css.fujitsu.com>	<20091029100042.973328d3.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>	<alpine.DEB.2.00.0910290125390.11476@chino.kir.corp.google.com>	<20091125124433.GB27615@random.random>	<4B0DC764.8040205@gmail.com> <20091126103234.806a4982.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
In-Reply-To: <20091126103234.806a4982.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1154
Lines: 35

KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:

> On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:10:12 +0100
> Vedran Furač <vedran.furac@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>>
>>> lengthy discussion on something I think is quite obviously better and
>>> I tried to change a couple of years back already (rss instead of
>>> total_vm).
>> Now that 2.6.32 is almost out, is it possible to get OOMK fixed in
>> 2.6.33 so that I could turn overcommit on (overcommit_memory=0) again
>> without fear of loosing my work?
>>
> I'll try fork-bomb detector again. That will finally help your X.org.
> But It may lose 2.6.33.
> 
> Adding new counter to mm_struct is now rejected because of scalability, so
> total work will need more time (than expected).
> I'm sorry I can't get enough time in these weeks.

Thanks for working on this! Hope it gets into 33. Keep me posted.

Regards,

Vedran


-- 
http://vedranf.net | a8e7a7783ca0d460fee090cc584adc12
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/