Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752716AbZK0Qid (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Nov 2009 11:38:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752332AbZK0Qid (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Nov 2009 11:38:33 -0500 Received: from www.tglx.de ([62.245.132.106]:52533 "EHLO www.tglx.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751465AbZK0Qic (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Nov 2009 11:38:32 -0500 Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:37:09 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Peter Zijlstra cc: Jiri Slaby , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, Avi Kivity , Marcelo Tosatti , kvm@vger.kernel.org, the arch/x86 maintainers , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: WARNING: kernel/smp.c:292 smp_call_function_single [Was: mmotm 2009-11-24-16-47 uploaded] In-Reply-To: <1259335036.6483.440.camel@laptop> Message-ID: References: <200911250111.nAP1BFg5030254@imap1.linux-foundation.org> <4B0FEA3E.5050108@gmail.com> <1259335036.6483.440.camel@laptop> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2406 Lines: 64 On Fri, 27 Nov 2009, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 16:03 +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote: > > On 11/25/2009 01:47 AM, akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote: > > > The mm-of-the-moment snapshot 2009-11-24-16-47 has been uploaded to > > > > Hi, when executing qemu-kvm I often get following warning and a hard lockup. > > > > WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:292 smp_call_function_single+0xbd/0x140() > > Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. > > Modules linked in: kvm_intel kvm fuse ath5k ath > > Pid: 3265, comm: qemu-kvm Not tainted 2.6.32-rc8-mm1_64 #912 > > Call Trace: > > [] warn_slowpath_common+0x78/0xb0 > > [] ? __vcpu_clear+0x0/0xd0 [kvm_intel] > > [] warn_slowpath_null+0xf/0x20 > > [] smp_call_function_single+0xbd/0x140 > > [] vmx_vcpu_load+0x46/0x170 [kvm_intel] > > [] kvm_arch_vcpu_load+0x24/0x60 [kvm] > > [] kvm_sched_in+0xd/0x10 [kvm] > > [] finish_task_switch+0x67/0xc0 > > [] schedule+0x2f8/0x9c0 > > > > > It is a regression against 2009-11-13-19-59. > > > > Any ideas? > > Looks like kvm is trying to send an IPI from the preempt notifiers, > which are called with IRQs disabled, not a sane thing to do. > > If they really want that, they'll have to use a pre-allocated struct > call_single_data and use __smp_call_function_single. Hmm, commit 498657a moved the fire_sched_in_preempt_notifiers() call into the irqs disabled section recently. sched, kvm: Fix race condition involving sched_in_preempt_notifers In finish_task_switch(), fire_sched_in_preempt_notifiers() is called after finish_lock_switch(). However, depending on architecture, preemption can be enabled after finish_lock_switch() which breaks the semantics of preempt notifiers. So move it before finish_arch_switch(). This also makes the in- notifiers symmetric to out- notifiers in terms of locking - now both are called under rq lock. It's not a surprise that this breaks the existing code which does the smp function call. Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/