From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>
To: Andy Walls <awalls@radix.net>
Cc: Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@gmail.com>, Christoph Bartelmus <lirc@bartelmus.de>,
       dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, j@jannau.net, jarod@redhat.com,
       jarod@wilsonet.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
       maximlevitsky@gmail.com, mchehab@redhat.com, stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de,
       superm1@ubuntu.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR  system?
References: <m3r5riy7py.fsf@intrepid.localdomain> <BDkdITRHqgB@lirc>
	<9e4733910911280906if1191a1jd3d055e8b781e45c@mail.gmail.com>
	<m3aay6y2m1.fsf@intrepid.localdomain>
	<9e4733910911280937k37551b38g90f4a60b73665853@mail.gmail.com>
	<1259450815.3137.19.camel@palomino.walls.org>
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:27:58 +0100
In-Reply-To: <1259450815.3137.19.camel@palomino.walls.org> (Andy Walls's
	message of "Sat, 28 Nov 2009 18:26:55 -0500")
Message-ID: <m3ocml6ppt.fsf@intrepid.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 639
Lines: 17

1. Do we agree that a lirc (-style) kernel-user interface is needed at
   least?

2. Is there any problem with lirc kernel-user interface?

If the answer for #1 is "yes" and for #2 is "no" then perhaps we merge
the Jarod's lirc patches (at least the core) so at least the
non-controversial part is done?

Doing so doesn't block improving input layer IR interface, does it?
-- 
Krzysztof Halasa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/