Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753173AbZK2Vbx (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:31:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752936AbZK2Vbw (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:31:52 -0500 Received: from mail-pz0-f171.google.com ([209.85.222.171]:42287 "EHLO mail-pz0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752505AbZK2Vbv (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:31:51 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=references:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:mime-version:subject:date:cc; b=m0qlpBHs/EXHLXJXav20R/I90t3FBLn0Z7kH9vLRRklCM/CuTZxubBkrtlGXPkOeU/ v37cseLLJuOOKTqrPTcHnJY2oXR3mjKopOAzMJV0jRKY4fITLO0cnijn7F/nCJTvIndH POAiO5RFlFuaVZ3KGDyYQtlU2OW0maxjFOR3I= References: <9e4733910911280906if1191a1jd3d055e8b781e45c@mail.gmail.com> <9e4733910911280937k37551b38g90f4a60b73665853@mail.gmail.com> <1259450815.3137.19.camel@palomino.walls.org> Message-Id: From: Dmitry Torokhov To: Krzysztof Halasa In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (7C144) Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 7C144) Subject: Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system? Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:31:46 -0800 Cc: Andy Walls , Jon Smirl , Christoph Bartelmus , "j@jannau.net" , "jarod@redhat.com" , "jarod@wilsonet.com" , "linux-input@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-media@vger.kernel.org" , "maximlevitsky@gmail.com" , "mchehab@redhat.com" , "stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de" , "superm1@ubuntu.com" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 702 Lines: 23 On Nov 29, 2009, at 12:27 PM, Krzysztof Halasa wrote: > 1. Do we agree that a lirc (-style) kernel-user interface is needed at > least? > > 2. Is there any problem with lirc kernel-user interface? > > If the answer for #1 is "yes" and for #2 is "no" then perhaps we merge > the Jarod's lirc patches (at least the core) so at least the > non-controversial part is done? Isn't the meat of Jarod's patch the lirc interface? -- > Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/