Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752947AbZK3Ibw (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Nov 2009 03:31:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752231AbZK3Ibv (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Nov 2009 03:31:51 -0500 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:43655 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752149AbZK3Ibv (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Nov 2009 03:31:51 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix isolcpus boot option From: Peter Zijlstra To: Anton Blanchard Cc: rusty@rustcorp.com.au, mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20091130000532.GW32182@kryten> References: <20091130000532.GW32182@kryten> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:31:47 +0100 Message-ID: <1259569907.13695.550.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 617 Lines: 13 On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 11:05 +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote: > Might be worth moving cpu_isolated_map into kernel/cpu.c and treat it > like the other cpu masks but I figured that change would have trouble > making 2.6.32. Thoughts? I'd love to kill off isolcpus in favour of exclusive cpusets, except that we need a bit more work on the latter to really make that happen. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/