Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 14:21:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 14:21:38 -0500 Received: from brooklyn-bridge.emea.veritas.com ([62.172.234.2]:56614 "EHLO einstein.homenet") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 14:21:24 -0500 Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 20:19:29 +0100 (BST) From: Tigran Aivazian X-X-Sender: To: Linus Torvalds cc: Alan Cox , Andrea Arcangeli , Arjan van de Ven , Hugh Dickins , Ingo Molnar , Stelian Pop , Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.5.5] do export vmalloc_to_page to modules... In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ok, but isn't it easier to rename _GPL -> _KERNEL (or _INTERNAL) if, indeed, that is the meaning thereof? Then, in the future, one wouldn't have to decide on a case by case basis like we had now (and appeal to Caesar :) because the intention would be clear from the name? On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Well, you're all wrong, bthththt... > > Removing the .._GPL() is in this case correct, but not for any of the > reasons mentioned, but simply because even Ingo agreed that it shouldn't > be _GPL since it's explicitly meant for drivers that shouldn't have any > knowledge whatsoever about the VM internals. GPL or not. > > The fact that the code was back-ported from 2.5.x and that the _GPL still > is there too is just a mistake, partly because I've not gotten any updates > from Ingo.. > > Linus > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/