Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 14:25:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 14:25:23 -0500 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:43274 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 14:25:03 -0500 Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 11:24:50 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds To: Tigran Aivazian cc: Alan Cox , Andrea Arcangeli , Arjan van de Ven , Hugh Dickins , Ingo Molnar , Stelian Pop , Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.5.5] do export vmalloc_to_page to modules... In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Tigran Aivazian wrote: > > Ok, but isn't it easier to rename _GPL -> _KERNEL (or _INTERNAL) if, > indeed, that is the meaning thereof? Then, in the future, one wouldn't > have to decide on a case by case basis like we had now (and appeal to > Caesar :) because the intention would be clear from the name? I agree, that is really the meaning of the _GPL thing, and it would probably also make people react less rabidly to the whole thing. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/