Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 15:09:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 15:09:36 -0500 Received: from brooklyn-bridge.emea.veritas.com ([62.172.234.2]:38200 "EHLO einstein.homenet") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 15:09:26 -0500 Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 21:05:58 +0100 (BST) From: Tigran Aivazian X-X-Sender: To: Alan Cox cc: Andrea Arcangeli , Arjan van de Ven , Hugh Dickins , Ingo Molnar , Stelian Pop , Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.5.5] do export vmalloc_to_page to modules... In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Alan Cox wrote: > Taking code I am one of the authors of and making it convenient for > people like veritas to use in non GPL code is quite different. Its > theft plain and simple. Alan, I don't want to try your patience but I have to emphasize that: yes, it should be authors decision (completely agree with you there!) whether a symbol is exported or not and whether it should be exported to all modules or only to some "internal/kernel" modules. But this is a technical issue, nothing to do with legalities/licenses or author's likes or dislikes of binary modules. But if the author's decision is based on a statement similar to "I spent N hours writing this function, it's okay to let GPL modules use it but no way I'll let the nasty veritas-like people use it", then I feel something is wrong somewhere. Then perhaps we could even refine the API to have EXPORT_SYMBOL_FRIENDS(sym,list_of_friends) where only "friends" can use the symbol and even then only if they first call (an exported function): register_export_payment(sym, sum); where 'sum' depends on the number of hours spent on writing sym(). I feared that perhaps I misunderstood the meaning of EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL but in the other "instance" of this thread Linus did confirm that it was correct. Regards, Tigran PS. unimportant detail for curious listeners on linux-kernel -- Veritas doesn't actually need vmalloc_to_page exported in any manner or form. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/