Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 16:08:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 16:08:32 -0500 Received: from brooklyn-bridge.emea.veritas.com ([62.172.234.2]:44627 "EHLO einstein.homenet") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 16:08:18 -0500 Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 22:05:44 +0100 (BST) From: Tigran Aivazian X-X-Sender: To: Marcelo Tosatti cc: Alan Cox , Andrea Arcangeli , Arjan van de Ven , Hugh Dickins , Ingo Molnar , Stelian Pop , Linus Torvalds , Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.5.5] do export vmalloc_to_page to modules... In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Tigran Aivazian wrote: > > > > Ok, but isn't it easier to rename _GPL -> _KERNEL (or _INTERNAL) if, > > indeed, that is the meaning thereof? Then, in the future, one wouldn't > > have to decide on a case by case basis like we had now (and appeal to > > Caesar :) because the intention would be clear from the name? > > I agree, that is really the meaning of the _GPL thing, and it would > probably also make people react less rabidly to the whole thing. > > Linus > Ok, so that would cover the 2.5.x (and future stable) kernels. Does Marcelo also agree that it should be the case in the 2.4.x kernel? Regards, Tigran - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/