Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753112AbZK3Ugj (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:36:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752290AbZK3Ugi (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:36:38 -0500 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:49494 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752154AbZK3Ugi (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:36:38 -0500 Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:36:44 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20091130.123644.203668577.davem@davemloft.net> To: william.allen.simpson@gmail.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: warning: massive change to conditional coding style in net? From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <4B13A025.7000103@gmail.com> References: <4B13A025.7000103@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.2 on Emacs 23.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1877 Lines: 42 From: William Allen Simpson Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 05:36:21 -0500 > Over the past several days, David Miller (with help from Joe Perches) > made sweeping changes to the format of conditional statements in the > net tree -- the equivalent of mass patches that change spaces. > > This makes writing patches for multiple versions of the tree very > difficult, and will make future pullups problematic. It's enough to > make a grown man cry.... Patching conflicts everywhere! William, you're unreasonable. We asked you to follow a certain style, and then you immediately complain that the style isn't followed consistently in the tree, and therefore as a consequence you shouldn't be required to follow it. Then Joe comes and submits patches making the tree follow the style more consistently. See, instead of merely complaining like you did, he proactively did something positive. Now you're complaining because this makes your patches harder to maintain. You're being difficult about this from every possible angle. I can only conclude that for whatever reason you don't want to have any requirements made upon you for your submission. You've handled this negatively in every way possible, and every step of the way. No matter how hard other people have been to try and help you, you've continued to do this. Whereas if you had merely fixed up the coding style as I and others have asked you, your code would be in my tree weeks ago. Why is it such a huge deal to follow the coding style that the maintainer (and other prominent developers of that subsystem) are asking you to follow? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/