Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753431AbZK3WNL (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:13:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753402AbZK3WNK (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:13:10 -0500 Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:45700 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753368AbZK3WNJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:13:09 -0500 Message-ID: <4B144346.50608@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:12:22 -0800 From: Yinghai Lu User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alex Williamson CC: jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Always set prefetchable base/limit upper32 registers References: <20091130212228.7555.43533.stgit@debian.lart> <4B143AE5.7040702@kernel.org> <1259617381.8949.281.camel@8530w.home> <4B143E83.6020105@kernel.org> <1259618496.8949.290.camel@8530w.home> In-Reply-To: <1259618496.8949.290.camel@8530w.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2187 Lines: 51 Alex Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 13:52 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote: >> Alex Williamson wrote: >>> On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 13:36 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote: >>>> Alex Williamson wrote: >>>>> - if (pref_mem64) { >>>>> - /* Set the upper 32 bits of PREF base & limit. */ >>>>> - pci_write_config_dword(bridge, PCI_PREF_BASE_UPPER32, bu); >>>>> - pci_write_config_dword(bridge, PCI_PREF_LIMIT_UPPER32, lu); >>>>> - } >>>>> + /* Set the upper 32 bits of PREF base & limit. */ >>>>> + pci_write_config_dword(bridge, PCI_PREF_BASE_UPPER32, bu); >>>>> + pci_write_config_dword(bridge, PCI_PREF_LIMIT_UPPER32, lu); >>>>> >>>>> pci_write_config_word(bridge, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, bus->bridge_ctl); >>>>> } >>>> when pref_mem64=0 it means that pref register is only 32 bit, we should not touch upper 32bits. >>> Did you read my patch description? In that case bu = lu = 0 and we >>> clear whatever state the BIOS left for those registers. >> if HW state that reg is only 32bit pref, why should we care about the upper 32bit? > > In my case, we're programming a 32bit prefetchable range into a 64bit > capable bridge. We can't just assume the upper 32bits are already zero. > >> looks like that your bridge device need quirk to clear that so called upper 32bit for it. > > I don't believe the PCI spec dictates whether the upper 32bit base > should be 0 or -1, so it's purely a BIOS initialization choice and Linux > should properly handle both. If the hardware only supports 32bit > prefetchable windows, the hardware will drop the write, just as it did > for every 2.6 kernel before 1f82de10. Thanks, current code: #define PCI_PREF_RANGE_TYPE_MASK 0x0fUL #define PCI_PREF_RANGE_TYPE_32 0x00 #define PCI_PREF_RANGE_TYPE_64 0x01 #define PCI_PREF_RANGE_MASK (~0x0fUL) if the HW state the pref mmio is 64bit, we will touch upper 32bit. otherwise we will not touch it. please post your boot log to show the problem. YH -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/