Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 17:39:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 17:39:45 -0500 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:13072 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 17:39:33 -0500 Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 19:39:04 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: Tigran Aivazian Cc: "Richard B. Johnson" , Gerd Knorr , , Hugh Dickins Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.5.5] do export vmalloc_to_page to modules... In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Tigran Aivazian wrote: > On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Rik van Riel wrote: > > after all Redhat, SuSE, Conectiva, etc. wouldn't want to have > > vmware and Veritas use their work without giving anything back ... > > I don't know about vmware (probably applies too) but more than one person > at Veritas can be justly offended by your implication that Veritas > employees have not contributed anything useful to the Linux kernel. > > I hope I understood you incorrectly and you weren't implying anything of > the kind. Indeed, Veritas has contributed significantly to kernel development, but I can't remember ever seeing anything but troubled users from companies like nvidia or vmware. Veritas was a bad example indeed ;) regards, Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/