Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 17:48:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 17:48:01 -0500 Received: from zikova.cvut.cz ([147.32.235.100]:20497 "EHLO zikova.cvut.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 17:47:49 -0500 From: "Petr Vandrovec" Organization: CC CTU Prague To: Rik van Riel Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 00:47:07 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.5.5] do export vmalloc_to_page to modules... CC: "Richard B. Johnson" , Gerd Knorr , , Hugh Dickins , riel@conectiva.com.br X-mailer: Pegasus Mail v3.50 Message-ID: <159BD1442BE@vcnet.vc.cvut.cz> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 3 Apr 02 at 19:39, Rik van Riel wrote: > On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Tigran Aivazian wrote: > > On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Rik van Riel wrote: > > > after all Redhat, SuSE, Conectiva, etc. wouldn't want to have > > > vmware and Veritas use their work without giving anything back ... > > > > I don't know about vmware (probably applies too) but more than one person > > at Veritas can be justly offended by your implication that Veritas > > employees have not contributed anything useful to the Linux kernel. > > Indeed, Veritas has contributed significantly to kernel development, > but I can't remember ever seeing anything but troubled users from > companies like nvidia or vmware. > > Veritas was a bad example indeed ;) Well, now I feel really offended. Maybe my contributions are not so big as yours, but I think that negating them completely is way too off. Petr Vandrovec (also) petr@vmware.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/