Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 4 Apr 2002 00:59:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 4 Apr 2002 00:59:31 -0500 Received: from tapu.f00f.org ([66.60.186.129]:29126 "EHLO tapu.f00f.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 4 Apr 2002 00:59:23 -0500 Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 21:59:02 -0800 From: Chris Wedgwood To: Rik van Riel Cc: Tigran Aivazian , "Richard B. Johnson" , Gerd Knorr , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hugh Dickins Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.5.5] do export vmalloc_to_page to modules... Message-ID: <20020404055902.GA6889@tapu.f00f.org> In-Reply-To:

Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-No-Archive: Yes Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 07:39:04PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote: Indeed, Veritas has contributed significantly to kernel development, but I can't remember ever seeing anything but troubled users from companies like nvidia or vmware. Considering the fact we are much more likely to hear complaints when things are broken and people are seeking a fix than praise otherwise, I think this is a little unfair. For the vast numbers of nvidia users I don't think there are that many problems reported and I'm not convinced the CURRENT nvidia drivers are necessarily doing anything bad[1]. --cw [1] People are welcome to provide code to prove me wrong. I use the nv hardware at times and it works very well, the machines don't suffer filesystem corruption, crashes or memory leaks. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/