Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754349AbZLCBoY (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Dec 2009 20:44:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753343AbZLCBoY (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Dec 2009 20:44:24 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:41081 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752036AbZLCBoX (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Dec 2009 20:44:23 -0500 X-Authenticated: #14349625 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18B6sgwCy0Bag+ar+AZCn/Fb1Hed8xGIgtSAuE9QO phoUpD0vZtUIZS Subject: Re: [patch] f83f9ac causes tasks running at MAX_PRIO From: Mike Galbraith To: Peter Williams Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , LKML , Steven Rostedt , Thomas Gleixner In-Reply-To: <4B17138D.3040003@bigpond.net.au> References: <1259501027.6268.9.camel@marge.simson.net> <1259754383.4003.610.camel@laptop> <1259758150.6167.8.camel@marge.simson.net> <4B17138D.3040003@bigpond.net.au> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 02:44:27 +0100 Message-Id: <1259804667.7691.19.camel@marge.simson.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.1.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.64 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1240 Lines: 26 On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 11:25 +1000, Peter Williams wrote: > On 02/12/09 22:49, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > Hysterical reasons? That might have been a doorstop conversion kit for > > O(1), but boots fine with CFS, and prio 40 tasks are history. > > In my (not so) humble opinion, there is still a lot of unnecessary cruft > in sched.c that should have been removed as the final (clean up) stage > of implementing CFS (i.e. stuff that was needed for O(1) but no longer > serves a useful purpose). I know that the extra overhead of this code > is probably inconsequential (and the compiler may even optimize some of > it away) but it looks untidy and makes the code harder to understand. > > Recent patches that I've submitted were intended as a start to removing > some of this cruft and I had intended to send more patches after they > were accepted. I figured that it was better to do it as a number of > small changes rather than one big one. Should I continue? Certainly. -Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/