Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756201AbZLCNyw (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Dec 2009 08:54:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756179AbZLCNyv (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Dec 2009 08:54:51 -0500 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.123]:33348 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756137AbZLCNyu (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Dec 2009 08:54:50 -0500 Subject: Re: trace/events: DECLARE vs DEFINE semantic From: Steven Rostedt Reply-To: rostedt@goodmis.org To: Masami Hiramatsu Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers , akpm@linux-foundation.org, Ingo Molnar , mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, randy.dunlap@oracle.com, wcohen@redhat.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de, jbaron@redhat.com, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig In-Reply-To: <4B17C25A.8090703@redhat.com> References: <20091202144334.GA30359@elte.hu> <1259765735.12870.42.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <20091202162715.GB9710@Krystal> <1259773888.12870.61.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <20091202180633.GF9710@Krystal> <1259777987.12870.70.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <20091202190135.GA23316@Krystal> <1259781578.12870.78.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <4B16EC06.6010706@redhat.com> <1259794005.12870.102.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <20091202231019.GB14770@Krystal> <4B1737E2.6010502@redhat.com> <1259813228.12870.108.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <4B17C25A.8090703@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Kihon Technologies Inc. Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 08:54:53 -0500 Message-Id: <1259848493.12870.114.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1901 Lines: 62 On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 08:51 -0500, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > > Basically, we should have a: > > > > kernel/sched_trace.c that includes the include/trace/events/sched.h and > > does the define. > > > > And the same goes for other trace points. > > Hmm, I'd rather like to move it into kernel/events/ or something new > sub directory, since those files will have just two lines (define and > include). I'm fine with a kernel/events dir. > > >> e.g. > >> > >> @kernel/tracepoint.c > >> ... > >> #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS > >> #include > >> #include > > > > We could do this for all that is defined in the include/trace/events. > > > >> ... > >> > >> @kernel/sched.c > >> ... > >> #include /* Just include events header */ > >> ... > >> > >> @fs/ext4/super.c (no change, since it can be module) > >> ... > >> #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS > >> #include > > > > Perhaps we should move out anything in include/trace/events that is also > > a module into its sub system? > > Would you mean putting those headers in sub-system's directory? > (e.g. fs/ext4/) > In that case, a problem will happen when user want to hook those > tracepoint from their module, because it is hard to find those > local headers. Why? Modules usually do have their own headers in their sub system. OK, if a module keeps their headers global (include/linux) then sure they can keep their tracepoint header in include/trace/events. But I still think that the module CREATE_TRACE_POINTS code should be kept with the module code itself (but in a small separate file). -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/