Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 4 Apr 2002 08:37:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 4 Apr 2002 08:37:16 -0500 Received: from red.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.70]:38302 "EHLO red.csi.cam.ac.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 4 Apr 2002 08:37:06 -0500 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020404142914.00a6aa70@pop.cus.cam.ac.uk> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 14:37:02 +0100 To: Padraig Brady From: Anton Altaparmakov Subject: Re: ANN: NTFS 2.0.1 for kernel 2.5.7 released Cc: Joachim Breuer , Nerijus Baliunas , , , In-Reply-To: <3CA87ABE.9000709@antefacto.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org At 16:20 01/04/02, Padraig Brady wrote: >Joachim Breuer wrote: >>Nerijus Baliunas writes: >> >>>On Fri, 29 Mar 2002 12:57:07 +0000 (GMT) Anton Altaparmakov >>> wrote: >>> >>>[...] Discussion about default fmask, mc, being able to run in place >>> snipped >>> >>>People using Linux usually keep data files on fat and ntfs permissions, not >>>executables (IMHO). >> >>For the sake of another vote: Yes, I do use NTFS primarily for data >>storage, and No, I don't like gratuitous x-bits. Not *at all*. > >Anton, there have been no votes the other way. What do you think now? I am tending towards a default fmask of 0177 now. I will change it for the next release. Happy? (-; Cheers, Anton -- "I've not lost my mind. It's backed up on tape somewhere." - Unknown -- Anton Altaparmakov (replace at with @) Linux NTFS Maintainer / WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/ ICQ: 8561279 / WWW: http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/