Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932090AbZLDGux (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Dec 2009 01:50:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752714AbZLDGux (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Dec 2009 01:50:53 -0500 Received: from mail-pz0-f184.google.com ([209.85.222.184]:41595 "EHLO mail-pz0-f184.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752705AbZLDGuw convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Dec 2009 01:50:52 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=iXfd4XKP0n4ZhBJO5Uy8blG8FwvKF34HvNWjAXkAU2vBm0uT9fP/POUskEMJw+dnWV vermxylb3LF3zqbJ1ZhLmhrSlWzDE8dlyJPqomIs/kvENMjCcwLDBm7NWxOeE+gdkWio 1cF9snCZM11GCNRJ+L0ep+56+1xCgqrWN300w= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1259900760-6424-1-git-send-email-dfeng@redhat.com> References: <1259900760-6424-1-git-send-email-dfeng@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 22:50:58 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPICA: don't cond_resched() when irq_disabled or in_atomic From: Justin Mattock To: Xiaotian Feng Cc: lenb@kernel.org, ming.m.lin@intel.com, robert.moore@intel.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2186 Lines: 58 On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 8:26 PM, Xiaotian Feng wrote: > commit 8bd108d adds preemption point after each opcode parse, then > a sleeping function called from invalid context bug was founded > during suspend/resume stage. this was fixed in commit abe1dfa by > don't cond_resched when irq_disabled. But recent commit 138d156 changes > the behaviour to don't cond_resched when in_atomic. This makes the > sleeping function called from invalid context bug happen again, which > is reported in http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/1/371. > > The fix is to cond_sched() only when preemptible, which means not in > irq_disabled or in_atomic. > > Reported-and-bisected-by: Larry Finger > Signed-off-by: Xiaotian Feng > --- > ?include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h | ? ?2 +- > ?1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h b/include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h > index 9d7febd..5b415ee 100644 > --- a/include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h > +++ b/include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h > @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ static inline void *acpi_os_acquire_object(acpi_cache_t * cache) > ?#include > ?#define ACPI_PREEMPTION_POINT() \ > ? ? ? ?do { \ > - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? if (!in_atomic_preempt_off()) \ > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? if (preemptible()) \ > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?cond_resched(); \ > ? ? ? ?} while (0) > > -- > 1.6.5.2 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at ?http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at ?http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > looks good kernel compiled without any issues, echo mem > /sys/power/state reported no warning message. Also if you don't mind add: Reported-and-bisected-by: Justin P. Mattock Id like to get some kind of credit for this b*tch. -- Justin P. Mattock -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/