Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 4 Apr 2002 11:22:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 4 Apr 2002 11:22:36 -0500 Received: from ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com ([166.70.28.69]:8758 "EHLO frodo.biederman.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 4 Apr 2002 11:21:10 -0500 To: Craig Cc: Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.4: BOOTPC /proc info. In-Reply-To: From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Date: 04 Apr 2002 09:13:54 -0700 Message-ID: Lines: 14 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Craig writes: > Yes, Alan mentions the same thing. > We didn't realize that was the long term plan. Is that documented anywhere, or > was it discussed on this list eons ago and 'decided'? ;) It has been discussed on this list several times. In fact every time this has come up. There are a lot of policy decisions the in kernel dhcp/bootpc code that are generally best left to user space. Al Viro has gone so far as proposed moving a lot of other parts into user space as well. But initramfs needs to be in the kernel for that. Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/