Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757035AbZLDQK7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Dec 2009 11:10:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932132AbZLDQK6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Dec 2009 11:10:58 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:35739 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932127AbZLDQK4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Dec 2009 11:10:56 -0500 Subject: Re: [RFC v4 PATCH 2/7] sched: Bandwidth initialization for fair task groups From: Peter Zijlstra To: bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dhaval Giani , Balbir Singh , Vaidyanathan Srinivasan , Gautham R Shenoy , Srivatsa Vaddagiri , Kamalesh Babulal , Ingo Molnar , Pavel Emelyanov , Herbert Poetzl , Avi Kivity , Chris Friesen , Paul Menage , Mike Waychison In-Reply-To: <20091117143439.GM17335@in.ibm.com> References: <20091117143306.GK17335@in.ibm.com> <20091117143439.GM17335@in.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 17:09:57 +0100 Message-ID: <1259942997.17907.896.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 522 Lines: 14 On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 20:04 +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote: > +/* > + * TODO: Check if this kind of timer setup is sufficient for cfs or > + * should we do what rt is doing. > + */ > +static void start_cfs_bandwidth(struct task_group *tg) is there a reason not to do as rt does? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/