Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932353AbZLDRgh (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Dec 2009 12:36:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932337AbZLDRgc (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Dec 2009 12:36:32 -0500 Received: from g4t0014.houston.hp.com ([15.201.24.17]:1736 "EHLO g4t0014.houston.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932336AbZLDRgb (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Dec 2009 12:36:31 -0500 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: djwong@us.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] acpi: support IBM SMBus CMI devices Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 10:36:35 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 Cc: lenb@kernel.org, Crane Cai , "linux-kernel" , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Jean Delvare References: <20091021173733.GN26149@tux1.beaverton.ibm.com> <20091027183619.16b0b952@hyperion.delvare> <20091204170621.GA10356@tux1.beaverton.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20091204170621.GA10356@tux1.beaverton.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200912041036.36686.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1300 Lines: 26 On Friday 04 December 2009 10:06:21 am Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 06:36:19PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > > On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:30:01 -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 06:03:32PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > > > > > > > I'm only half please with this. You change the function named, but it > > > > doesn't follow the calling convention of acpi_dock_match(), which is a > > > > little confusing. > > > > > > > > Anyway, I will need an ack from the ACPI people before I can pick this > > > > patch. Or maybe they should even push it upstream themselves. > > Len/Bjorn: Any opinion on this ACPI quirk patch to make i2c-scmi work on IBM > systems? I think the i2c-scmi part is in Jean's tree, but I still need this > second patch to the ACPI code itself. Did you pick it up, or should I resend? I'm a little confused as to where we left things. Can you repost the current series in a new thread? It looks like there might be places that use "SMBUSIBM" when they should use ACPI_SMBUS_IBM_HID. Bjorn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/