Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756922AbZLERug (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Dec 2009 12:50:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756743AbZLERuf (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Dec 2009 12:50:35 -0500 Received: from mail.perches.com ([173.55.12.10]:1027 "EHLO mail.perches.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756699AbZLERue (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Dec 2009 12:50:34 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] drivers/net: Move && and || to end of previous line From: Joe Perches To: William Allen Simpson Cc: Brice Goglin , David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Developers In-Reply-To: <4B1A557D.4080707@gmail.com> References: <1259001504.16503.79.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> <20091123.104130.117837098.davem@davemloft.net> <1259528449.29779.194.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> <20091129.165557.84377714.davem@davemloft.net> <1259863101.22783.63.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> <4B190A29.5080905@myri.com> <1259947271.22783.120.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> <4B1A557D.4080707@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 09:50:40 -0800 Message-ID: <1260035440.11126.50.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1524 Lines: 46 On Sat, 2009-12-05 at 07:43 -0500, William Allen Simpson wrote: > Joe Perches wrote: > > On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 14:10 +0100, Brice Goglin wrote: > >> Joe Perches wrote: > >>> Only files where David Miller is the primary git-signer. > >>> wireless, wimax, ixgbe, etc are not modified. > >> What's the point? Having them at the beginning of the next line is > >> easier to read from my point of view. > > It's just a stupid consistency thing. > Joe *agrees* that > having them on the beginning of the line is preferred. This is not true. I prefer code that I write for myself to use leading continuation tests. For the Linux code, as should be obvious from the patches I submit, I prefer to have adherence to one predominant majority style. I don't much care what form that style actually takes. > Thousands of > contributors throughout the tree agree. > This is entirely a Miller thing. Nope. There have been many efforts to help standardize on single form styles. > My main objection to these sweeping patches is that it makes it much > more difficult to maintain and apply patches across different versions of > the tree. I think you underestimate the value of standardization and overestimate the quantity of work to sort it out for the -stable versions. cheers, Joe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/