Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758085AbZLFDgc (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Dec 2009 22:36:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758046AbZLFDg1 (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Dec 2009 22:36:27 -0500 Received: from mail-gx0-f226.google.com ([209.85.217.226]:38829 "EHLO mail-gx0-f226.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758034AbZLFDg0 (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Dec 2009 22:36:26 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ezllcLgnOuOMX9mnvKN/kNqs5nO5a3FJvZ/rzzYgmBIOBhhfII3wtvMDBgf63O3jvx cUEJwps5MQZl/5YXezJEeCEGLrBT3kpgkwzg4wZpjm2bzzD2RBTwOcs45F8uh9jFHwPw Hwp2RIxatVm+980Arrw49ZctsWXqPPtc2kQvQ= Message-ID: <4B1B26B6.2060506@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 22:36:22 -0500 From: William Allen Simpson User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joe Perches CC: Brice Goglin , David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Developers Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] drivers/net: Move && and || to end of previous line References: <1259001504.16503.79.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> <20091123.104130.117837098.davem@davemloft.net> <1259528449.29779.194.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> <20091129.165557.84377714.davem@davemloft.net> <1259863101.22783.63.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> <4B190A29.5080905@myri.com> <1259947271.22783.120.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> <4B1A557D.4080707@gmail.com> <1260035440.11126.50.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> In-Reply-To: <1260035440.11126.50.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1600 Lines: 36 Joe Perches wrote: > On Sat, 2009-12-05 at 07:43 -0500, William Allen Simpson wrote: >> My main objection to these sweeping patches is that it makes it much >> more difficult to maintain and apply patches across different versions of >> the tree. > > I think you underestimate the value of > standardization and overestimate the > quantity of work to sort it out for > the -stable versions. > As I mentioned to somebody in private email (having kept rough track), it took around 9 hours this week for my 8 patch series, spread over 3 days because of the tedium. Fix rejects, visually check patch against previous version, compile, test -- at least 1/2 to 1 hour for each numbered patch. Plus time to resubmit the patch series to the list again. Of course, that was only for the initial patches already posted to the list. I've many more -- awaiting approval for the previous set.... Eventually, I have to do the same for each supported -stable version. Multiply by thousands of contributors. Hopefully, you did the same, carefully checking your regexp generated patches visually line by line, and compiling, and testing every driver in this large patch individually. I'm not a big believer in making trivial formatting changes and assuming they work. Or that I didn't fumble fingers somehow. I've made many such stupid mistakes over the years. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/