Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933637AbZLFDiz (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Dec 2009 22:38:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758046AbZLFDit (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Dec 2009 22:38:49 -0500 Received: from mail-in-17.arcor-online.net ([151.189.21.57]:38504 "EHLO mail-in-17.arcor-online.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758027AbZLFDis (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Dec 2009 22:38:48 -0500 X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 mail-in-11.arcor-online.net D1520E3912 Subject: Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system? From: hermann pitton To: Jon Smirl Cc: Christoph Bartelmus , dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, awalls@radix.net, j@jannau.net, jarod@redhat.com, jarod@wilsonet.com, khc@pm.waw.pl, kraxel@redhat.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, mchehab@redhat.com, superm1@ubuntu.com In-Reply-To: <9e4733910912041628g5bedc9d2jbee3b0861aeb5511@mail.gmail.com> References: <20091204220708.GD25669@core.coreip.homeip.net> <9e4733910912041628g5bedc9d2jbee3b0861aeb5511@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2009 04:36:33 +0100 Message-Id: <1260070593.3236.6.camel@pc07.localdom.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 (2.12.3-5.fc8) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1222 Lines: 32 Hi, Am Freitag, den 04.12.2009, 19:28 -0500 schrieb Jon Smirl: > On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Christoph Bartelmus wrote: > > BTW, I just came across a XMP remote that seems to generate 3x64 bit scan > > codes. Anyone here has docs on the XMP protocol? > > Assuming a general purpose receiver (not one with fixed hardware > decoding), is it important for Linux to receive IR signals from all > possible remotes no matter how old or obscure? Or is it acceptable to > tell the user to throw away their dedicated remote and buy a universal > multi-function one? Universal multi-function remotes are $12 in my > grocery store - I don't even have to go to an electronics store. finally we have some point here, IMHO, that is not acceptable and I told you previously not to bet on such. Start some poll and win it, and I'll shut up :) To be frank, you are quite mad at this point, or deliver working other remotes to __all__ for free. Cheers, Hermann -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/