Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756340AbZLFMNu (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Dec 2009 07:13:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755205AbZLFMNt (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Dec 2009 07:13:49 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.186]:58035 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753945AbZLFMNr (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Dec 2009 07:13:47 -0500 Date: 06 Dec 2009 13:12:00 +0100 From: lirc@bartelmus.de (Christoph Bartelmus) To: jonsmirl@gmail.com Cc: awalls@radix.net Cc: dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com Cc: j@jannau.net Cc: jarod@redhat.com Cc: jarod@wilsonet.com Cc: khc@pm.waw.pl Cc: kraxel@redhat.com Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org Cc: mchehab@redhat.com Cc: superm1@ubuntu.com Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <9e4733910912041628g5bedc9d2jbee3b0861aeb5511@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system? User-Agent: OpenXP/4.10.7369 (Linux) (i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19ajFUiBsakkJrfjNDJ4k8x3zql57dG/zp0cFt TGNT5pgeAn7Fh51a3GuGu1ZrBuVTiIUCanOX7WyMqTUff2VkFW mnXmjCdmj6TftBxe5rzVWXxKfRaPXH5 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1381 Lines: 30 Hi Jon, on 04 Dec 09 at 19:28, Jon Smirl wrote: >> BTW, I just came across a XMP remote that seems to generate 3x64 bit >> scan codes. Anyone here has docs on the XMP protocol? > > Assuming a general purpose receiver (not one with fixed hardware > decoding), is it important for Linux to receive IR signals from all > possible remotes no matter how old or obscure? Or is it acceptable to [...] > Of course transmitting is a completely different problem, but we > haven't been talking about transmitting. I can see how we would need > to record any IR protocol in order to retransmit it. But that's in the > 5% of users world, not the 90% that want MythTV to "just work". Use > something like LIRC if you want to transmit. I don't think anyone here is in the position to be able to tell what is 90% or 5%. Personally I use LIRC exclusively for transmit to my settop box using an old and obscure RECS80 protocol. No, I won't replace my setup just because it's old and obscure. Cable companies tend to provide XMP based boxes to subscribers more often these days. Simply not supporting these setups is a no-go for me. Christoph -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/