Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S311782AbSDDWpy>; Thu, 4 Apr 2002 17:45:54 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S311829AbSDDWpo>; Thu, 4 Apr 2002 17:45:44 -0500
Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:55568 "EHLO
	the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S311782AbSDDWpb>; Thu, 4 Apr 2002 17:45:31 -0500
Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.19-pre5-ac2
To: akpm@zip.com.au (Andrew Morton)
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 00:01:48 +0100 (BST)
Cc: alan@redhat.com (Alan Cox), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        arjanv@redhat.com (Arjan Van de Ven)
In-Reply-To: <3CACD3FE.1323F721@zip.com.au> from "Andrew Morton" at Apr 04, 2002 02:30:22 PM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <E16tGEm-0006z9-00@the-village.bc.nu>
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> Not singling out Arjan; certainly this is not the most egregious
> case lately.  But.  Will people please stop sending kernel
> patches straight to tree owners without copying the appropriate
> mailing list?

So long as its going into the -ac tree not the base one is this a bad 
thing. Its nicely started discussion on the matter.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/