Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965114AbZLGVrR (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Dec 2009 16:47:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965072AbZLGVrP (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Dec 2009 16:47:15 -0500 Received: from static-72-93-233-3.bstnma.fios.verizon.net ([72.93.233.3]:49015 "EHLO mail.wilsonet.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965065AbZLGVrN convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Dec 2009 16:47:13 -0500 Subject: Re: [RFC] Should we create a raw input interface for IR's ? - Was: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v2] lirc core device driver infrastructure Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Jarod Wilson In-Reply-To: <1259264614.1781.47.camel@localhost> Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 13:19:12 -0500 Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Krzysztof Halasa , Christoph Bartelmus , dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, j@jannau.net, jarod@redhat.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, superm1@ubuntu.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Message-Id: <6B4C84CD-F146-4B8B-A8BB-9963E0BA4C47@wilsonet.com> References: <1259024037.3871.36.camel@palomino.walls.org> <4B0E8B32.3020509@redhat.com> <1259264614.1781.47.camel@localhost> To: Andy Walls X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3330 Lines: 80 On Nov 26, 2009, at 2:43 PM, Andy Walls wrote: > On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 12:05 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: >> Krzysztof Halasa wrote: >>> Andy Walls writes: >>> >>>> I would also note that RC-6 Mode 6A, used by most MCE remotes, was >>>> developed by Philips, but Microsoft has some sort of licensing interest >>>> in it and it is almost surely encumbered somwhow: >>> >>> I don't know about legal problems in some countries but from the >>> technical POV handling the protocol in the kernel is more efficient >>> or (/and) simpler. >> >> A software licensing from Microsoft won't apply to Linux kernel, so I'm >> assuming that you're referring to some patent that they could be filled >> about RC6 mode 6A. >> >> I don't know if is there any US patent pending about it (AFAIK, only US >> accepts software patents), but there are some prior-art for IR key >> decoding. So, I don't see what "innovation" RC6 would be adding. >> If it is some new way to transmit waves, the patent issues >> aren't related to software, and the device manufacturer had already handled >> it when they made their devices. >> >> If it is just a new keytable, this issue >> could be easily solved by loading the keytable via userspace. >> >> Also, assuming that you can use the driver only with a hardware that comes >> with a licensed software, the user has already the license for using it. >> >> Do you have any details on what patents they are claiming? > > The US Philips RC-6 patent is US Patent 5,877,702 > > http://www.google.com/patents?vid=USPAT5877702 > > Click on download PDF to get a copy of the whole patent. > > I am not a lawyer. Philips claims' all appear to tie to a transmitter > or receiver as part of a system, but most of the claims are about > information and bit positions and lengths. ... > IMO, given > > a. the dearth of public information about RC-6, indicating someone > thinks it's their trade secret or intellectual property > > b. Microsoft claiming to license something related to the MCE remote > protocols (which are obviously RC-6 Mode 6A), > > c. my inability to draw a "clear, bright line" that RC-6 Mode 6A > encoding and decoding, as needed by MCE remotes, implemented in software > doesn't violate anyone's government granted rights to exclusivity. > > I think it's much better to implement software RC-6 Mode 6A encoding and > decoding in user space, doing only the minimum needed to get the > hardware setup and going in the kernel. > > Encoding/decoding of RC-6 by microcontrollers with firmware doesn't > worry me. > > > Maybe I'm being too conservative here, but I have a personal interest in > keeping Linux free and unencumbered even in the US which, I cannot deny, > has a patent system that is screwed up. So I had one of the people who does all the license and patent audits for Fedora packages look at the Philips patent on RC-6. He's 100% positive that the patent *only* covers hardware, there should be no problem whatsoever writing a software decoder for RC-6. -- Jarod Wilson jarod@wilsonet.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/