Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753304AbZLHG5j (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2009 01:57:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752920AbZLHG5i (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2009 01:57:38 -0500 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:59253 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751618AbZLHG5h (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2009 01:57:37 -0500 Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 07:57:25 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Bryan Donlan Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro , Ulrich Drepper , Timo Sirainen , WANG Cong , Oleg Nesterov , LKML , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] Added PR_SET_PROCTITLE_AREA option for prctl() Message-ID: <20091208065725.GA21340@elte.hu> References: <20091208121145.B58D.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <20091208044605.GA32669@elte.hu> <20091208135010.B5A8.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <20091208053851.GA12383@elte.hu> <3e8340490912072228m70368001v2487bd745ff208b3@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3e8340490912072228m70368001v2487bd745ff208b3@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-ELTE-SpamScore: 0.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=0.0 required=5.9 tests=none autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5 _SUMMARY_ Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1307 Lines: 34 * Bryan Donlan wrote: > On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 12:38 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > > > >> > The feature looks useful, but the choice of a prctl as an API is strange > >> > - it limits us to the current task only - while the ability to set > >> > arguments for another task looks a more generic (and potentially more > >> > useful) solution. > >> > >> No. It's impossible. > >> /proc/{pid}/cmdline read user process's memory. iow, this prctl() don't > >> receive string, it receive virtual address itself. [...] > > > > it's not 'impossible' at all, you yourself mention ptrace: > > If another process is going to use ptrace to inject the cmdline string > into the victim's address space, it can also temporarily hijack a > thread to run prctl() on its behalf... That's exactly the point i made. There's no reason not to offer the API i suggested as long as permissions are checked (as usual) - because ptrace already allows this (and more). Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/