Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751195AbZLHIxr (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2009 03:53:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751033AbZLHIxq (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2009 03:53:46 -0500 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:41817 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750911AbZLHIxp (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2009 03:53:45 -0500 Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 09:53:43 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Daniel Walker Cc: Arve Hj?nnev?g , kernel list , linux-arm-kernel , Brian Swetland , Iliyan Malchev , linux-kernel@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: tree with htc dream support Message-ID: <20091208085342.GD12264@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20091205221100.GA32522@elf.ucw.cz> <1260054737.23633.35.camel@desktop> <20091206074120.GA1615@ucw.cz> <1260107487.23633.55.camel@desktop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1260107487.23633.55.camel@desktop> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1603 Lines: 38 On Sun 2009-12-06 05:51:27, Daniel Walker wrote: > On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 08:41 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Hi! > > > > > > Where is the tree with HTC Dream support? I thought it was > > > > > > > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/dwalker/linux-msm.git;a=summary > > > > > > > > but it does not seem to contain basic dream support (board file and > > > > serial console) and I thought that was going to linus for 2.6.33...? > > > > > > It's here > > > > > > git://codeaurora.org/quic/kernel/dwalker/linux-msm.git > > ... > > > It's been in Linux-next for maybe two weeks .. I've been trying to > > > decide if I should submit it for 2.6.33. I'm going to be adding boat > > > loads of additional msm code and doing a fairly large merge for > > > 2.6.34 .. So your code would get better testing if we wait for that. > > > > > > However, If you really want it in 2.6.33 I'll try to accommodate you. > > > > It would be good to get it in 2.6.33, so that we can build on it, and > > so that you are marked as official maintainer etc. I do not think that > > code would benefit from any additional delays... > > Ok. Fine with me, unless someone else has a specific objection . Any news here? Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/