Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932545AbZLHQXL (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2009 11:23:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756033AbZLHQXK (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2009 11:23:10 -0500 Received: from tac.ki.iif.hu ([193.6.222.43]:38894 "EHLO tac.ki.iif.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756007AbZLHQXI (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2009 11:23:08 -0500 From: Ferenc Wagner To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: Jon Smirl , Andy Walls , Dmitry Torokhov , Jarod Wilson , Krzysztof Halasa , Christoph Bartelmus , j@jannau.net, jarod@redhat.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, superm1@ubuntu.com Subject: Re: [RFC] Should we create a raw input interface for IR's ? - Was: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v2] lirc core device driver infrastructure References: <4B0E8B32.3020509@redhat.com> <1259264614.1781.47.camel@localhost> <6B4C84CD-F146-4B8B-A8BB-9963E0BA4C47@wilsonet.com> <1260240142.3086.14.camel@palomino.walls.org> <20091208042210.GA11147@core.coreip.homeip.net> <1260275743.3094.6.camel@palomino.walls.org> <4B1E54FF.8060404@redhat.com> <9e4733910912080547j75c2c885o29664470ff5e2c6a@mail.gmail.com> <4B1E5BDF.7010202@redhat.com> <9e4733910912080619t36089c9bg5e54114844b9694a@mail.gmail.com> <4B1E640B.6030705@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 17:22:49 +0100 In-Reply-To: <4B1E640B.6030705@redhat.com> (Mauro Carvalho Chehab's message of "Tue, 08 Dec 2009 12:34:51 -0200") Message-ID: <87ocm9wi3q.fsf@tac.ki.iif.hu> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1071 Lines: 26 Mauro Carvalho Chehab writes: > Jon Smirl wrote: > >> This model is complicated by the fact that some remotes that look >> like multi-function remotes aren't really multifunction. The remote >> bundled with the MS MCE receiver is one. That remote is a single >> function device even though it has function buttons for TV, Music, >> Pictures, etc. > > An unsolved question on my mind is how should we map such IR's? Should > we provide a way for them to emulate a multifunction IR (for example, > after pressing TV key, subsequent keystrokes would be directed to the > TV evdev device?), or should we let this up to some userspace app to > handle this case? This case feels similar to that of Caps Lock, Num Lock and Scrool Lock, but I don't know if that scheme could be applied here. -- Regards, Feri. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/