Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 5 Apr 2002 04:01:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 5 Apr 2002 04:01:18 -0500 Received: from elin.scali.no ([62.70.89.10]:36625 "EHLO elin.scali.no") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 5 Apr 2002 04:01:00 -0500 Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 11:00:59 +0200 (CEST) From: Steffen Persvold To: cc: Subject: Re: [BUG] compile error in 2.4.19-pre5-ac1 In-Reply-To: <200204050741.g357fQK11963@fenrus.demon.nl> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 5 Apr 2002 arjan@fenrus.demon.nl wrote: > In article you wrote: > > Then it's a bit odd that RH ships a new kernel-headers RPM (which > > contains the /usr/include/{linux,asm} directories) for each kernel > > update and glibc still beeing the same, isn't it ? > > Yes it is; and we fixed that properly in the current beta. But note > that the updates are minor anyway (between errata the headers don't > actually change in general); and people complain loudly when I exclude the > kernel-headers package..... Wouldn't it be more logical to have the kernel-headers stuff inside the glibc-devel package (I guess you have thought about this already...). Why do people complain if you remove the kernel-headers package ? Regards, -- Steffen Persvold | Scalable Linux Systems | Try out the world's best mailto:sp@scali.com | http://www.scali.com | performing MPI implementation: Tel: (+47) 2262 8950 | Olaf Helsets vei 6 | - ScaMPI 1.13.8 - Fax: (+47) 2262 8951 | N0621 Oslo, NORWAY | >320MBytes/s and <4uS latency - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/