Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966018AbZLHUQm (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2009 15:16:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S966003AbZLHUQj (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2009 15:16:39 -0500 Received: from iolanthe.rowland.org ([192.131.102.54]:57991 "HELO iolanthe.rowland.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S965995AbZLHUQi (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2009 15:16:38 -0500 Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 15:16:44 -0500 (EST) From: Alan Stern X-X-Sender: stern@iolanthe.rowland.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" cc: Linus Torvalds , Zhang Rui , LKML , ACPI Devel Maling List , pm list Subject: Re: Async resume patch (was: Re: [GIT PULL] PM updates for 2.6.33) In-Reply-To: <200912082044.52098.rjw@sisk.pl> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1453 Lines: 32 On Tue, 8 Dec 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Suppose we use rwsem and during suspend each child uses a down_read() on a > parent and then the parent uses down_write() on itself. What if, whatever the > reason, the parent is a bit early and does the down_write() before one of the > children has a chance to do the down_read()? Aren't we toast? > > Do we need any direct protection against that or does it just work itself out > in a way I just don't see right now? That's not the way it should be done. Linus had children taking their parents' locks during suspend, which is simple but leads to difficulties. Instead, the PM core should do a down_write() on each device before starting the device's async suspend routine, and an up_write() when the routine finishes. Parents should, at the start of their async routine, do down_read() on each of their children plus whatever other devices they need to wait for. The core can do the waiting for children part and the driver's suspend routine can handle any other waiting. This is a little more awkward because it requires the parent to iterate through its children. But it does solve the off-tree dependency problem for suspends. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/