Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966970AbZLIAUX (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2009 19:20:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S966900AbZLIAUV (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2009 19:20:21 -0500 Received: from mail-ew0-f209.google.com ([209.85.219.209]:46932 "EHLO mail-ew0-f209.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966774AbZLIAUT convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2009 19:20:19 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=Q6IwCgXACQ0QOBh5SAP73bQ8D0dyeVfaCnAfUAphFWdjbBzewnVMP81hUX1awQAj6C +q60P8UXO2Z/+AFMdpSJ0LK/kLG4DFNq+ebKyrxt/jxiu9cNR0Cch04l8exeAm34JtF3 /Jb5ejqBYtsR26bLqA2Xn8x7WiGOLP3B67Rus= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <829197380912081511k2ad53053t1a1f73b6e8571f75@mail.gmail.com> References: <20091208214246.GA21857@kroah.com> <829197380912081349q32b554acob7055431d65fc26f@mail.gmail.com> <37219a840912081502v3fdf1879xdb28e867eb82884c@mail.gmail.com> <829197380912081511k2ad53053t1a1f73b6e8571f75@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 19:20:24 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 6040e34295bdf10d Message-ID: <37219a840912081620r1d34a13dpf3a36f83f82c9a67@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: 2.6.27.40 build error From: Michael Krufky To: Devin Heitmueller Cc: Greg KH , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1319 Lines: 32 On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Devin Heitmueller wrote: > On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 6:02 PM, Michael Krufky wrote: >> Yes -- please drop it for now. ?I didn't actually send this for >> 2.6.27.y anyway -- it must have gotten to you some other way. >> >> Devin, if 2.6.27.y needs this fix, can you please generate the >> appropriate backport and test it before we resubmit? > > We would have to decide whether it's worth the effort to get a 2.6.27 > environment setup to do the necessary regression testing. ?At this > point, I would argue that driver was screwed up enough in 2.6.27 that > I wouldn't be inclined to tell users it worked even with this one fix. > > Devin Fine with me -- I'm glad the v4l-dvb development repositories hosted on both linuxtv.org and kernellabs.com are backwards compatible with recent kernels... :-) I think all the crucial fixes (except for the pvrusb2 16k firmware patch) are all merged into 2.6.31.y as of now... So, now we can focus on new driver support for 2.6.32 :-) Cheers, Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/