Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756839AbZLIGx3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Dec 2009 01:53:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756734AbZLIGxZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Dec 2009 01:53:25 -0500 Received: from adelie.canonical.com ([91.189.90.139]:43913 "EHLO adelie.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756693AbZLIGxY (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Dec 2009 01:53:24 -0500 Message-ID: <4B1F4963.3070405@canonical.com> Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 14:53:23 +0800 From: Ike Panhc User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Corentin Chary CC: Matthew Garrett , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, acpi4asus-user@lists.sourceforge.net, Alexandre Rostovtsev Subject: Re: [Resend] [PATCH] asus-laptop: add Lenovo SL LenovoCare LED support References: <1260257829-7343-1-git-send-email-ike.pan@canonical.com> <20091208154154.GA26435@srcf.ucam.org> <71cd59b00912080932nf334ba7uf65c70178fec41a5@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <71cd59b00912080932nf334ba7uf65c70178fec41a5@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1653 Lines: 33 Corentin Chary wrote: > On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 03:37:09PM +0800, Ike Panhc wrote: >> >>> ASUS_HANDLE(rled_set, ASUS_HOTK_PREFIX "RLED"); /* W1JC */ >>> ASUS_HANDLE(pled_set, ASUS_HOTK_PREFIX "PLED"); /* A7J */ >>> ASUS_HANDLE(gled_set, ASUS_HOTK_PREFIX "GLED"); /* G1, G2 (probably) */ >> The driver is controlling the ATKD device, which has a HID of ATK0101. >> These devices are all underneath it... >> >>> +ASUS_HANDLE(lled_set, "\\_SB_.PCI0.SBRG.EC0_.HKEY.TVLS"); /* LenovoCare */ >> And this one isn't, which is a bit jarring. Looking closer, it's under >> the LEN0014 device, which means that you're trying to touch a method >> that belongs to a device other than the one this driver is bound to. >> That's wrong. You want a separate ACPI driver for the LEN0014 device, >> and this should be called for there. Looking at it, you seem to get >> rfkill as well (the GWAN/SWAN, GBDC/SBDF and GUWB/SUWB methods) and >> maybe some other stuff. >> >> So this shouldn't go in asus-laptop. You'll need to add another separate >> driver for the SL-specific functionality. > > That means asus-laptop and sl-laptop will be both needed for a SL > laptop, but I don't think this is a problem. > I think your suggestion is that one acpi driver for one acpi device. It makes sense to me. I will build a new driver. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/