Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 5 Apr 2002 07:13:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 5 Apr 2002 07:13:30 -0500 Received: from loewe.cosy.sbg.ac.at ([141.201.2.12]:51593 "EHLO loewe.cosy.sbg.ac.at") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 5 Apr 2002 07:13:10 -0500 Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 14:13:07 +0200 (MET DST) From: "Thomas 'Dent' Mirlacher" To: Helge Hafting cc: joeja@mindspring.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: faster boots? In-Reply-To: <3CAD55F7.55C56F96@aitel.hist.no> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org improving kernel bootup time: what about saving the parameters for successfully loaded modules? (like the IRQs and other stuff which gets autodetected.) - and when those modules are loaded for the second time, the saves values will be used, without the need to do autoprobing (don't know how much time that will save, but it should save quite some time for people having all the drivers in the kernel, but no matching hardware) - this will only work if there are no static inits, but everything's modularized (which should be in the works?) - also you need to have a parameter to reprobe the whole modules - this would also give a nice template for building a customized kernel (well again for people who are not really used to do things like that) just my $0.02 tm -- in some way i do, and in some way i don't. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/