Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756604AbZLISTp (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Dec 2009 13:19:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755587AbZLISTk (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Dec 2009 13:19:40 -0500 Received: from claw.goop.org ([74.207.240.146]:33041 "EHLO claw.goop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751492AbZLISTj (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Dec 2009 13:19:39 -0500 Message-ID: <4B1FEA3F.7090300@goop.org> Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 10:19:43 -0800 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091125 Fedora/3.0-3.12.rc1.fc12 Lightning/1.0pre Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ingo Molnar CC: Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton , Hugh Dickens Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86/paravirt for v2.6.33 References: <20091203210913.GA24351@elte.hu> <20091209073632.GD8187@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20091209073632.GD8187@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1180 Lines: 31 On 12/08/09 23:36, Ingo Molnar wrote: >> The old version that actually passed the stack frame was better. Why >> pick the inferior version? >> > Yeah, agreed. I missed that detail. > Which detail is that? The whole patch? ;) > Jeremy, mind sending a patch that updates this code to use the less > obfuscated 32-bit version, not the 64-bit version? (a delta patch > against tip:master would be nice, as there's a fair amount of testing in > the unification change itself already, which we dont want to discard.) > Sure. But I'm not sure I understand the objection to task_pt_regs(); is it considered deprecated? This patch received quite a lot of discussion with no mention of it. Should we consider all its uses as suspect? Would it be better to have something similar which just returns a pointer to the saved [re]flags, since that's all we care about? That should be easier to make robust against J -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/