Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758849AbZLIX5d (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Dec 2009 18:57:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758794AbZLIX5c (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Dec 2009 18:57:32 -0500 Received: from fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.37]:37704 "EHLO fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758730AbZLIX5b (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Dec 2009 18:57:31 -0500 X-SecurityPolicyCheck-FJ: OK by FujitsuOutboundMailChecker v1.3.1 Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 08:54:13 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki To: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: Chris Wright , KOSAKI Motohiro , Rik van Riel , Hugh Dickins , Andrew Morton , Izik Eidus , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] ksm: let shared pages be swappable Message-Id: <20091210085413.0fe4369e.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <20091209161219.GV28697@random.random> References: <20091202125501.GD28697@random.random> <20091203134610.586E.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <20091204135938.5886.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <20091204141617.f4c491e7.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20091204171640.GE19624@x200.localdomain> <20091209094331.a1f53e6d.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20091209161219.GV28697@random.random> Organization: FUJITSU Co. LTD. X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.5.0 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-mingw32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1411 Lines: 34 On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 17:12:19 +0100 Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 09:43:31AM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > > cache-line ping-pong at fork beacause of page->mapcount. And KSM introduces > > zero-pages which have mapcount again. If no problems in realitsitc usage of > > KVM, ignore me. > > The whole memory marked MADV_MERGEABLE by KVM is also marked > MADV_DONTFORK, so if KVM was to fork (and if it did, if it wasn't for > MADV_DONTFORK, it would also trigger all O_DIRECT vs fork race > conditions too, as KVM is one of the many apps that uses threads and > O_DIRECT - we try not to fork though but we sure did in the past), no > slowdown could ever happen in mapcount because of KSM, all KSM pages > aren't visibile by child. > > It's still something to keep in mind for other KSM users, but I don't > think mapcount is big deal if compared to the risk of triggering COWs > later on those pages, in general KSM is all about saving tons of > memory at the expense of some CPU cycle (kksmd, cows, mapcount with > parallel forks etc...). > Okay, thank you for kindlt explanation. and sorry for noise. Thanks, -Kame -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/