Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761726AbZLJVSF (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:18:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1761715AbZLJVSD (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:18:03 -0500 Received: from mail-yw0-f176.google.com ([209.85.211.176]:44502 "EHLO mail-yw0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761711AbZLJVR7 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:17:59 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ibC1V5QEdkwk41a/PrB6j7upKLGIHDRZ4tyMHxdpBeEiJjXrrQsOWTFYvXIVpKiubr c1m9kmFxH7nE3egL1hW6bZtvnLkuORxnVMZ8c0ayEGq95uTHHr2rgZ2L8HqamBlGJvUP knVAy/19IGoCjqZCm9qEmqws5vegYzrCjR8os= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <200912102210.12124.arnd@arndb.de> References: <200912071614.46166.arnd@arndb.de> <200912102210.12124.arnd@arndb.de> From: Mike Frysinger Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:17:44 -0500 Message-ID: <8bd0f97a0912101317v8143e67w9e2f1224111ac0d7@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: What's in asm-generic.git To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: liqin.chen@sunplusct.com, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1258 Lines: 28 2009/12/10 Arnd Bergmann: > On Monday 07 December 2009, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> On Monday 07 December 2009, liqin.chen@sunplusct.com wrote: >> > Arnd Bergmann 写于 2009-12-04 03:14:08: >> > >> > Maybe you can add a __NR_set_thread_area define in asm-generic/unsitd.h >> > for tls used. >> >> Yes, good point. I'll update the syscall list with this, and also check if more >> syscalls have been addded. > > I have found now that sys_accept4 was missing. sys_set_thread_area however > is only defined on x86 and mips. Since you don't currently implement this > on score, maybe it would be more appropriate to handle it like the other > architectures do, rather than adding it to asm-generic/unistd.h? isnt the point of asm-generic/unistd.h to collect all common syscalls ? if there's syscalls that ideally should be handled by everyone but currently doesnt, then it's easy to define it in the header but have the actual entry.S leave it as a hole ... or maybe i'm missing what's going on -mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/