Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762139AbZLKBrx (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Dec 2009 20:47:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756267AbZLKBru (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Dec 2009 20:47:50 -0500 Received: from ey-out-2122.google.com ([74.125.78.27]:1654 "EHLO ey-out-2122.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755750AbZLKBrs convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Dec 2009 20:47:48 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=fp6JeUTCVCwav/4N4F96cCRJcc+ymnCVU3duGXNgkFeHXLOWm2lZXS0h/3R2nt3x3U da6b9l2fj49xkxWsTbK2wpq20W6jv8jcXxcSovX5LF/mv/QxAzHp1djWVQIbx+qWo7Y1 fm9MqN+1c/jPyjmRAvola0rxmhZKMCNmWGIiM= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4B217219.6040109@crca.org.au> References: <20091210184931.257A.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <4B217219.6040109@crca.org.au> Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:47:54 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: mmotm-2009-12-08-17-45 resume slowly From: Dave Young To: Nigel Cunningham Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , netdev , linux-wireless , "David S. Miller" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2194 Lines: 66 On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 6:11 AM, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > Dave, could you be more specific? > > Is the delay Ksaki has picked out related to your report... I can not reproduce the wireless delay today, maybe related to wireless environment? > > KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: >> (cc to netdev) >> >> Hi net-folks >> >>>> [  561.323866] mtrr: type mismatch for e0000000,10000000 old: >>>> write-back new: write-combining >>>> [ 2688.500033] No probe response from AP 00:02:2d:08:51:2b after >>>> 500ms, disconnecting. >>>> [ 2689.580376] wlan0: direct probe to AP 00:02:2d:08:51:2b (try 1) >> >> What's mean "No probe response"? Why its point waste 2000sec? > > [...] > >>>> [  225.731462] ACPI: Preparing to enter system sleep state S3 >>>> [  225.754167] Disabling non-boot CPUs ... >>>> [  225.809478] CPU 1 is now offline >>>> [  225.809481] lockdep: fixing up alternatives. >>>> [  225.809487] SMP alternatives: switching to UP code >>>> [  225.816500] Extended CMOS year: 2000 >>>> [  225.816500] Back to C! >>>> [  225.816500] Extended CMOS year: 2000 >>>> [  225.816720] Enabling non-boot CPUs ... >>>> [  225.818422] lockdep: fixing up alternatives. >>>> [  225.818425] SMP alternatives: switching to SMP code >>>> [  225.822188] Booting processor 1 APIC 0x1 ip 0x6000 >>>> [  225.818021] Initializing CPU#1 >>>> [  225.818021] CPU: Physical Processor ID: 0 >>>> [  225.818021] CPU: Processor Core ID: 1 >>>> [  225.913392] CPU1: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU     T7250  @ 2.00GHz stepping 0d >>>> [  225.937046] microcode: CPU1 sig=0x6fd, pf=0x80, revision=0xa3 >>>> [  225.937053] platform microcode: firmware: requesting intel-ucode/06-0f-0d >>>> [  225.937179] firmware microcode: parent microcode should not be sleeping >>>> [  285.940840] CPU1 is up > > ... or the 60 second delay before the CPU1 is up message? Yes, this delay occurs every time > > Regards, > > Nigel > -- Regards dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/