Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 5 Apr 2002 14:10:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 5 Apr 2002 14:10:23 -0500 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:39945 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 5 Apr 2002 14:10:08 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.5.5] do export vmalloc_to_page to modules... To: davids@webmaster.com (David Schwartz) Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 20:27:18 +0100 (BST) Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk (Tigran Aivazian), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: from "David Schwartz" at Apr 05, 2002 10:46:39 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > The GPL permits you to modify and use GPL'd code however you wish provided > you don't distribute it. The GPL permits you to modify, use, and distribute > GPL'd code however you like provided you make the source available. (subject to the other conditions it lays down) In the US I believe so. In the UK at least loading the code into memory has been ruled an act of copying by a court. > > No you just aren't thinking about the larger picture > > You are not thinking in principles. A GPL'd package with a digital rights > management scheme you are prohibited from modifying is an abomination to the > principles the GPL was supposed to stand for. This is not free as in > freedom. If you are prohibited from modifying the code then the code violates the GPL so isnt GPL so isnt distributable as GPL. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/