Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 5 Apr 2002 14:08:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 5 Apr 2002 14:08:33 -0500 Received: from mhw.ulib.iupui.edu ([134.68.164.123]:24547 "EHLO mhw.ULib.IUPUI.Edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 5 Apr 2002 14:08:23 -0500 Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 14:08:23 -0500 (EST) From: "Mark H. Wood" X-X-Sender: To: Subject: Re: faster boots? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 4 Apr 2002 joeja@mindspring.com wrote: [snip] > If I have a machine that does not change from day to day hardware > wise why when I boot the thing do I need to probe the hardware again > and again each time? Would passing more options on the command line > help like all the addresses and IRQ's of known hardware? > Wouldn't it make sense to store this data on the files system? Certainly > if something like grub or lilo can figure out how to access a file on > the drive the kernel could check for a 'defaults' file or something to > get the default irq's, hardware, interrupts, etc from. Then the kernel > could probe these first and if the probe fails proble elsewhere for the > device. Eww, it sounds like all that unnecessary and problematic hardware info. that MS Windows saves in the Registry, instead of doing the sensible thing by asking the hardware. Please don't go there. -- Mark H. Wood, Lead System Programmer mwood@IUPUI.Edu MS Windows *is* user-friendly, but only for certain values of "user". - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/