Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756482AbZLKMsu (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Dec 2009 07:48:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756091AbZLKMsq (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Dec 2009 07:48:46 -0500 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:46149 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753732AbZLKMsq (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Dec 2009 07:48:46 -0500 Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:48:35 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Jamie Iles Cc: David Miller , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, peterz@infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf tools: allow building for ARM Message-ID: <20091211124835.GB14509@elte.hu> References: <1260523260-15694-1-git-send-email-jamie.iles@picochip.com> <20091211102316.GB16882@elte.hu> <20091211.023808.233094506.davem@davemloft.net> <20091211104126.GA22079@elte.hu> <20091211114858.GE4164@wear.picochip.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091211114858.GE4164@wear.picochip.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-ELTE-SpamScore: 0.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=0.0 required=5.9 tests=none autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5 _SUMMARY_ Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1304 Lines: 28 * Jamie Iles wrote: > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 11:41:26AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > I think he did it this way so it can compile in the meantime, and that > > > doing it right requires runtime cpu detection to select which barrier > > > instruction is even available on the current ARM cpu. > > > > Yeah. We can merge a quick patch for it if runtime detection is > > difficult - but if then such a patch should err on the side of using the > > barrier instruction unconditionally - even if this causes perf to > > segfault on certain (older? UP configured?) ARM cores. > > Ok, unless anyone has any objections, I'll post a revised patch that > uses the MCR instruction so that we get the correct behaviour on v6/v7 > SMP and UP systems and an illegal instruction on v5 or earlier. I've > had a quick look at runtime detection and the ID registers are only > accessible from privileged modes so for long term, it might be better > to define the rmb() at build time from the kernel config. Sounds good to me. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/