Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 5 Apr 2002 18:04:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 5 Apr 2002 18:03:51 -0500 Received: from mail.actcom.co.il ([192.114.47.13]:35018 "EHLO lmail.actcom.co.il") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 5 Apr 2002 18:03:34 -0500 Message-Id: <200204052302.g35N2o516910@lmail.actcom.co.il> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Itai Nahshon Reply-To: nahshon@actcom.co.il To: Alan Cox , rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca (Richard Gooch) Subject: Re: faster boots? Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2002 02:02:36 +0300 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), bcrl@redhat.com (Benjamin LaHaise), akpm@zip.com.au (Andrew Morton), joeja@mindspring.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 05 April 2002 15:49 pm, Alan Cox wrote: > > Be careful here. I did this for a while with a Maxtor 80 GB IDE drive, > > and after a few months, it started making unpleasant noises when > > spinning up (lots of clicking and clacking). I went back to continuous > > I can tell you I've had 80Gb Maxtors do that that were always spun up. They > went back and the replacement ones have behaved so far. I don't think its > that related > That should all on a per-disk configuration. I would like a different, configurable spin-down timeout (optionally never) for each disk. A required feature IMHO: there should _never_ be dirty blocks for disks that are not spinning. Maybe it is possible to internally remount RO file systems that have data on the disk before spinning down. Should not be much of a problem if the file system is mounted with noatime and there aren't any files open for writing nor directory operations in progress. I'd rather have open() blocking and not fill all the memory with dirty buffers that need to wait for spin-up to complete before they can be written. Swap areas, direct access to block device. loop devices and raid partitions may be more difficult but you get the idea... -- Itai - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/