Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758479AbZLKOpS (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:45:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758408AbZLKOpP (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:45:15 -0500 Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:40522 "EHLO smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758236AbZLKOpO (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:45:14 -0500 Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:42:22 -0500 From: "John W. Linville" To: Stefan Seyfried Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add support for Sphairon Homelink 1202 USB WLAN Message-ID: <20091211144221.GA6663@tuxdriver.com> References: <1260282095-17042-1-git-send-email-stefan.seyfried@googlemail.com> <20091211133603.46bec686@strolchi.home.s3e.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091211133603.46bec686@strolchi.home.s3e.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1683 Lines: 41 On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 01:36:03PM +0100, Stefan Seyfried wrote: > On Tue, 8 Dec 2009 15:21:33 +0100 > Stefan Seyfried wrote: > > > From: Stefan Seyfried > > > > The following two trivial patches add support for this device to > > zd1211rw (ejecting the virtual USB drive) and ar9170usb (that drives > > the WLAN chip inside). > > Is anyhting wrong with those? > Are those too trivial and "USB only" and thus better suited for direct > submission to Greg? Trivial or not, they are wireless LAN patches and they go here. FWIW, you posted them in the middle of the maintainer's merge window for 2.6.33. So for now only fixes are being merged. I wasn't sure these qualified, although upon closer review they may. It strikes me as strange that you are hitting two drivers to support one device. Are you saying that your ar9170usb has the goofy storage device thing using the same USB IDs that the zd1211rw devices like that used? I suppose that makes some sense given the shared heritage... We did just have a long (and possibly unresolved thread) about this type of practice (i.e. eject in the driver) not too long ago. But since zd1211rw is already doing this, maybe this patch is acceptable...? Anyway, I have your patch. Please be patient. John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/