Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 6 Apr 2002 00:11:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 6 Apr 2002 00:10:58 -0500 Received: from mail3.aracnet.com ([216.99.193.38]:11728 "EHLO mail3.aracnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 6 Apr 2002 00:10:45 -0500 From: "M. Edward Borasky" To: "Rick A. Hohensee" , Subject: RE: Forth interpreter as kernel module Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 21:10:58 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > -----Original Message----- > From: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org > [mailto:linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org]On Behalf Of Rick A. Hohensee > Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 5:22 PM > To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Forth interpreter as kernel module > Phil Burk is I believe still affiliated with Mills College. He'd love to > hear about this. Mike Haas too, probably. Mike Haas wrote the kernel of > Amiga JForth and Phil wrote all the music stuff. I added all the Linux > syscalls to the PForth in cLIeNUX mostly out of nostalgia for JForth, a > "...once in a paradigm thing." Jack "jax" Woehr (sp?). Phil was quite > pleased to hear there's a PForth out there with 160 Linux syscalls as > primitives. Yes, Phil Burk is still doing music ... no, he's not doing it in Forth, but in Java. Hunt up "jmsl" and "jsyn" for the details. I haven't heard much from Jack recently; I have his book which had an ANS-ish 16-bit DOS Forth on a floppy. At one time, I was doing some absolutely *amazing* things with 16-bit Forths on my HP100LX Palmtop PC. Still, I must confess I haven't been to the Taygeta Scientific Forth archive in over a year. > More to the point, Forth can be a great personalizer of unix/Linux. Sure, > you don't want a Forth in your DNS box. (I do, but...) You do want a Forth > in your multimedia box. Bigtime. Which is why the "forth" command in > cLIeNUX is upforth, PForth with a unix Jones. Well, I want a full-strength Forth in my Linux box -- I've got SwiftForth Pro on my Windows system and I'm holding out for something of that comprehensive nature on Linux. I have to admit I haven't played with the gForth that I think comes with my Red Hat distro, so I don't know what it's like. I've heard hard-core Forthers gag profusely at the mere mention of gForth. So, enough "old Forthers home week" on the Linux kernel mailing list, eh? : TOOT FORTH LOVE IF HONK THEN ; -- M. Edward (Ed) Borasky, Chief Scientist, Borasky Research http://www.borasky-research.net http://www.aracnet.com/~znmeb mailto:znmeb@borasky-research.net mailto:znmeb@aracnet.com Q. Who invented the non-Von Neumann computer architecture? A. John non-Von Neumann. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/