Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 6 Apr 2002 04:09:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 6 Apr 2002 04:09:34 -0500 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237]:1522 "EHLO passion.cambridge.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 6 Apr 2002 04:09:23 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 From: David Woodhouse X-Accept-Language: en_GB In-Reply-To: <20020403.143504.87584295.davem@redhat.com> To: "David S. Miller" Cc: tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk, riel@conectiva.com.br, root@chaos.analogic.com, kraxel@bytesex.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hugh@veritas.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.5.5] do export vmalloc_to_page to modules... Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2002 10:08:41 +0100 Message-ID: <11103.1018084121@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org davem@redhat.com said: > If such a misconception exists (incorrect or not), it would be helped > if the majority of people who do Linux kernel work and are working at > these companies didn't use foo@yahoo.com (or other anonymous) email > addresses in their postings here. > The Vger postmasters knows who you cowards really are, because we see > the final destination when your email bounces :-)))) It's not that simple. Using a company email address implies that you accept company standards of reliability for email. Sometimes it even means you have to use Notes. We know who we all work for, in the majority of cases. There are advantages to not wearing your allegiance on your sleeve in technical fora too. -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/